The Morning After the Wedding

Early in the morning, the bridegroom was called by his friends to go to the bath. This was part of the wedding custom. When he rose from the bridal chamber, the Sultana presented him with fine linen garments to use for bathing. These clothes were a sign of honor and generosity from the bride.

After these ceremonies were completed, the husband and wife became more familiar with one another. However, even though they were now married, the Sultana continued to behave with dignity and distance in public. She did not treat her husband as an equal before others.

The Superiority of the Sultana

In public, the Sultana kept a clear distance between herself and her husband. She often wore her dagger at her side as a symbol of her royal authority and superiority. This showed that she remained a princess of the Ottoman dynasty and that her noble birth placed her above her husband in rank Customized Round Turkey Tours.

She also frequently requested expensive gifts, jewels, and money from him. As a result, many of these Pashas gradually lost much of their wealth. What seemed at first to be a great honor—marrying into the royal family—often became a heavy financial and emotional burden.

Marriage and Political Danger

The difficulties did not end with financial demands. These royal sons-in-law were often placed in dangerous military positions. They were sent on difficult campaigns or risky missions. In this way, they faced constant danger.

One example was Ismail Pasha, who was killed while crossing the River Raab during a defeat of the Ottoman army by imperial forces under the command of Raimondo Montecuccoli. Such events were not rare. Other royal sons-in-law also lost their lives in similar circumstances.

These assignments were not always accidental. The Ottoman government did not want these men to become too proud because of their marriage into the ruling family. Without hardships and risks, they might begin to imagine themselves equal to the Sultan or dream of greater power.

A System of Control

Through these customs, the Ottoman state carefully controlled even its closest relatives. Marriage to a Sultana brought honor, but it also brought strict limits, heavy expenses, and serious dangers. The system ensured that no man, even one connected to the royal family, could grow too powerful or ambitious.

In this way, the authority of the Sultan remained supreme. Honor was given, but independence was reduced. Prestige was offered, but freedom was limited. This balance helped protect the stability of the empire and prevented rival claims to power.

Limiting the Power of Great Men

In the Ottoman Empire, the rulers were very careful to prevent powerful men from becoming too strong. This policy did not apply only to Pashas and high officials. It also applied to members of the Ottoman ruling family itself. The government wanted to make sure that no one could grow so rich or powerful that he might try to claim the supreme throne.

The Ottoman political system was based on strict and original laws. These laws were designed to protect the absolute authority of the Sultan. Even close relatives of the royal family were not free from these rules. In fact, they were sometimes treated with even greater strictness than ordinary officials.

Restrictions on the Children of Princesses

According to Ottoman law, the children of a Sultana (a princess of the Ottoman family) who married a Pasha were not allowed to hold high office in the empire. Even though their mother belonged to the ruling house, they could not rise to important positions in government or the army. The highest position they could usually reach was that of a Capugibashi, which means the chief of the palace gatekeepers. This was an honorable post, but it was not a position of political power Customized Private Turkey Tours.

These descendants were not allowed to boast about their royal blood. Speaking proudly about their family connection to the Sultan was considered disrespectful and almost equal to treason. For this reason, they lived quietly and avoided drawing attention to themselves.

The Example of the Ibrahim Hanogulları

There was, however, one family known for descending from the Ottoman line. They were called the Ibrahim Hanogulları, meaning the sons or descendants of Sultan Ibrahim. Sultan Ibrahim ruled in the seventeenth century. This family was said to be connected to him through the female line, as their father was the son of a sister of the Sultan and had married a princess. Some also believed they had Tatar ancestry.

Because their descent came through the women of the dynasty, less attention was given to their bloodline. They were allowed to live with a large annual income, said to be about 70,000 dollars. Despite their wealth, they behaved with wisdom and modesty. They lived honorably but without showing pride or luxury.

Survival Through Modesty

The Ibrahim Hanogulları avoided government office and did not interfere in state affairs. They understood that seeking power could bring danger, envy, and suspicion. In the Ottoman system, political life was often uncertain and risky. Many powerful men lost their positions or even their lives during changes in government.

By living quietly and avoiding ambition, this family protected itself. Their example shows how careful members of the Ottoman elite had to be. Even royal blood did not guarantee safety. True security came from loyalty, modesty, and staying away from political competition.

In this way, the Ottoman Empire preserved the supreme authority of the Sultan and prevented the rise of rival branches within the ruling house.

Preventing the Growth of Old Wealth

One important rule of Ottoman political thought was to prevent the rise of old and powerful noble families. Wealth was seen as the next step toward nobility. If a family could keep its riches for many generations, it might become too strong and independent. To avoid this danger, the Ottoman rulers followed a strict policy.

This idea is similar to a principle described by Niccolò Machiavelli. He wrote that the safest way to stop the pride and power of great men is to take away the sources of their strength. In the Ottoman Empire, this meant preventing officials from building permanent family wealth. The Sultan did not allow powerful governors to create lasting dynasties based on money and property.

Confiscation of Estates

When a Pasha died, the Sultan took control of his property. The Sultan, as supreme ruler, claimed the estates of all high officials. If the Pasha had children, they did not automatically inherit their father’s wealth. Instead, the Sultan decided how much money or property they would receive for their support. This amount was often limited Customized Private Turkey Tours.

In this way, no family could easily pass great riches from one generation to another. Even if a Pasha had served faithfully for many years, his wealth returned to the treasury after his death. This system kept the central authority strong and prevented the rise of rival noble houses.

Marriage into the Royal Family

The situation was similar when a Pasha married a princess of the Ottoman family. If he was married to a Sultana, who might be the Sultan’s sister, daughter, or close relative, special financial rules applied. When such a Pasha died, the dowry (called the kabin) of the princess was first taken from his estate. This dowry was often very large, sometimes reaching 100,000 dollars or more in value.

After the dowry was removed, the remaining wealth went to the Sultan as the main heir. Again, the children did not automatically inherit the full estate. The Sultan controlled the distribution of property.

The Decline of Old Noble Families

Because of these policies, old noble families could not maintain their former greatness. Ancient lines of nobility slowly disappeared. In Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul), the daughters of once-great Greek families sometimes married simple men such as shepherds or carters. Families like the House of Kantakouzenos and the Palaiologos dynasty, who had once ruled or held high rank in the Byzantine Empire, lived in modest and sometimes poor conditions.

This system shows clearly that in the Ottoman Empire, power and wealth depended on the Sultan alone. No family could become permanently strong without his approval. By controlling property and inheritance, the Sultan protected his authority and prevented the growth of independent aristocracy.

The Position of Pashas in the Ottoman System

In the Ottoman system, Pashas were powerful governors and military leaders. However, their power did not come from noble birth or personal virtue. It came directly from the favor of the Sultan. A man became a Pasha because the Sultan trusted him, not because he belonged to a noble family. For this reason, a Pasha who lost the Sultan’s protection also lost his importance and honor. Once imprisoned, he was treated like an ordinary soldier. He was not exchanged with high-ranking Christian commanders or noble prisoners. Without the Sultan’s support, he was no longer seen as a great man.

This shows an important rule of Ottoman politics: position and authority depended entirely on the ruler’s will. Noble blood did not protect a man. Personal success and high office could disappear in a moment if the Sultan withdrew his favor Customized Private Turkey Tours.

Hereditary Governors in Certain Regions

Although most Pashas held office only by the Sultan’s pleasure, there were a few exceptions. In some smaller and distant regions, certain Pashas were allowed to pass their position from father to son. This special privilege came from an old grant given by the Sultan. Such hereditary rule was rare and carefully limited.

Among the places where this happened were Gaza, parts of Kurdistan, and some districts once connected to Damascus and Aleppo. In these areas, local rulers sometimes kept power within their families for generations. However, even this privilege depended on the central government’s acceptance.

The Pasha of Gaza A Man of Tolerance

One Pasha of Gaza was remembered with great respect. He was known for his kindness toward Christians, especially the monks of Jerusalem. He often sent them gifts, such as rice and other supplies for their monastery. His actions showed a spirit of tolerance and goodwill.

When the Father Guardian of the Holy Sepulchre visited him, the Pasha welcomed him warmly. He went out to meet him at some distance from his house, showing unusual respect. This behavior was different from what Ottoman officials usually showed toward non-Muslims. Because of his good character and peaceful life, he was admired by many people.

A Sad and Sudden End

This Pasha governed Gaza for seventy-five years and had inherited his position from his father. He lived a long life without rebellion or crime. However, despite his loyalty and peaceful rule, he was called to the imperial capital with promises of fair treatment.

When he arrived, he was executed without trial or public accusation. His long service and old age did not protect him. The reason was political. The central government feared that allowing such long hereditary rule might weaken Ottoman authority. It was seen as a dangerous exception to normal policy.

His death shows again how uncertain power was in the Ottoman Empire. No matter how loyal or honorable a governor might be, his life and position always depended on the Sultan’s will.

Converts Who Became Zealous Turks

Many of those who converted to Islam did not remain half-hearted believers. Over time, they became fully part of Turkish society. Through habit, education, and personal ambition, some truly believed in their new religion. Others, even if they once doubted, grew attached to their new identity.

In many cases, these converts became stronger enemies of Christianity than the Turks by birth. They tried to prove their loyalty and devotion. History shows that several famous Ottoman commanders at sea were originally Christians who had converted. One example is Cığalazade Yusuf Sinan Pasha, who had been born into a Christian family but later rose to high rank in the Ottoman navy. Such men often fought fiercely against the lands and faith of their childhood Istanbul Old City Tours.

Their success in battle, especially at sea, helped strengthen the empire. At the same time, their actions showed how completely they had adopted their new cause.

The Taking of Christian Children

In earlier centuries, the Ottomans followed a strict system known as the devshirme. Every few years, Christian boys were taken from their families in conquered territories. These children were educated in Islam and trained for service in the army or government.

Through this policy, the empire increased its own population while weakening the Christian communities. The strongest and most talented boys were removed from their homes and raised as loyal servants of the Sultan.

In later times, this custom became less common. There were already many Greeks, Armenians, Jews, and others living under Ottoman rule. Many of them chose to convert voluntarily, hoping to gain social advantages and avoid heavy discrimination.

Pressure and Poverty

It is not surprising that some Christians abandoned their faith. They often lived under oppression and contempt. Heavy taxes and limited rights made life difficult. In addition, poverty among the clergy sometimes led to poor education in the churches. Without strong teaching and support, some believers became discouraged.

Faced with hardship, a few chose to convert in order to improve their condition. They hoped for better treatment and greater opportunity.

The Survival of the Church

Yet despite this pressure, many Christians remained faithful. It is remarkable that, under such difficult circumstances, Christian communities continued to exist. Their survival seemed to fulfill the words of Jesus Christ, who said that the gates of hell would not prevail against his Church.

Even in times of persecution and loss, faith endured. Though many were taken, converted, or discouraged, others remained firm. Their perseverance stands as a testimony to the strength of belief under trial.

Suspicion Is Enough for Destruction

In the Ottoman Empire, if a powerful man was suspected of planning rebellion or causing unrest, suspicion alone could lead to his death. It did not matter whether there was clear proof. If the Sultan believed that a governor’s wealth, influence, or natural ability made him dangerous, that was enough.

The Sultan would not openly show anger at first. Instead, he would hide his displeasure. The official might even receive signs of favor. A fine horse, a sword, or a rich fur robe might be sent as a gift. Polite words and friendly messages would be given. Everything would appear peaceful and honorable.

But this kindness was often only a disguise. At the right moment, the executioner would arrive with the bowstring, the usual instrument of execution for high officers. Once the cord was placed around the man’s neck, there was no mercy. The respect shown earlier would disappear, and the end would be swift and harsh Guided Round Tours Turkey.

This policy has been compared to a story told by the ancient writer Plutarch. He wrote that birds sometimes attack a cuckoo because they fear it may one day grow into a hawk. In the same way, the Sultan destroyed men who might later become powerful threats.

Removal Without Warning

To make space for new officers who were waiting for promotion, and to carry out executions quietly, the Sultan often used another method. A great official might be removed from his current position and given what seemed to be an even higher office in a distant province.

He would leave the capital with honor. His departure would be filled with ceremony and signs of royal favor. Surrounded by servants and filled with hope, he would travel proudly toward his new government.

Yet before three days had passed, a secret order might reach him. Without public accusation, without trial, and without clear reason other than the Sultan’s will, he would be executed. His body would often be buried quickly in a foreign land. No grand funeral, no monument, and no lasting memory would remain.

Fear as a Tool of Rule

This system created deep fear among high officials. No man, however honored, felt secure. Power depended entirely on the Sultan’s pleasure. Wealth and rank could vanish in a moment.

Such methods are similar to the policy sometimes attributed to Tiberius, who also used suspicion and sudden punishment to control powerful men. By removing those who seemed dangerous, the ruler strengthened his own position.

In this way, the Ottoman Sultan ruled through caution, secrecy, and fear. Great men rose quickly, but they could fall just as suddenly.

Control Through Oppression

The Ottoman ruler governed many different nations and peoples who had been conquered over time. These groups spoke different languages and followed different customs. To keep them obedient, the Turks often used strong and severe rule. Heavy taxation, strict laws, and harsh punishment were common tools of control.

The ordinary people, especially those who were not Turks, felt the weight of this oppression the most. They carried their burdens like animals under heavy loads. Poverty and fear kept them quiet. They had little power to resist Guided Round Tours Turkey.

However, those who were Turks and held office in the empire did not suffer in the same way. Officials and soldiers enjoyed freedom and privilege. They were often allowed to act boldly and even harshly toward others. Their position gave them confidence and pride. Since few dared to challenge them, they lived with a sense of power and superiority.

The Fate of Corrupt Governors

The end of these powerful men is very remarkable. Many governors, especially the Pashas, worked hard to gather wealth during their time in office. They taxed heavily, seized property, and enriched themselves quickly. Yet, their success often did not last long.

It was common for the Sultan to remove them suddenly. In many cases, he ordered their execution. In other cases, he stripped them of their riches and took their wealth into the royal treasury. The money they had gathered was declared to be wrongly gained.

Among all these governors, those who ruled in Cairo often suffered the hardest fate. Cairo was one of the richest and most important provinces in the empire. Because of this, its governor had many chances to become wealthy. But this also made him a target. Either on his journey back to the capital or soon after his return, he might lose his life by order of the Sultan. If he survived, he was often robbed of most of his property.

Wealth Gathered for the Sultan

It is strange to see how eagerly these men continued to gather riches, even though they knew from many examples that their wealth might soon be taken away. Experience showed them that they were often collecting treasure not for themselves, but for their master.

In the end, they kept only the hatred and curses of the people they had oppressed. The wealth passed to the Sultan, while the blame remained with them.

A Policy of Fear and Control

This system resembles the policy once used by Cesare Borgia, also known as the Duke of Valentinois. He allowed his ministers to act harshly and cruelly, and when the people grew angry, he punished those ministers publicly. In this way, he appeared just, while others bore the blame.

Similarly, the Ottoman Sultan allowed governors to enrich themselves for a time. But when it suited him, he punished them and took their wealth. Through this method, he strengthened his own power and reminded all officials that their fortune depended entirely on his will.

Offices Given for Merit in Earlier Times

In earlier times of the Ottoman Empire, especially during its strongest and most successful periods, offices were often given as rewards for merit and good service. When the empire was growing and winning wars, rulers looked carefully at the virtue, courage, and skill of their servants. Men who showed loyalty and bravery were honored openly.

Positions were given freely, without demanding large sums of money in return. Rewards were seen as gifts of royal favor, not as goods to be bought and sold. This practice allowed talented men to rise by their abilities. Their honor was not stained by payments or secret agreements. Their success reflected their worth.

During those years, the empire expanded and flourished. Strong leadership and fair reward encouraged courage and faithful service Guided Round Tours Turkey.

Change and Signs of Decline

In later times, however, this system changed. Offices were often sold for money, and merit was no longer the main reason for promotion. Wealth began to matter more than ability. This change caused many observers to believe that the empire was declining.

When good customs are replaced by corruption, it can be a sign that a state is weakening. As the Roman historian Livy once suggested, success follows when the gods favor a nation, but misfortune comes when they turn away. In the same way, the change from merit to money seemed to show a loss of strength and virtue within the Ottoman government.

Heavy Taxes and the Spirit of the People

Although this corrupt system harmed justice, it did serve one important purpose for the rulers. Governors and high officers, who had paid large sums for their positions, often placed heavy taxes on the people to recover their losses. They also seized property and demanded payments whenever possible.

As a result, the common people became poor and discouraged. Constant taxation reduced their courage. When people struggle simply to survive, they have little strength left to think about rebellion.

The English writer Francis Bacon, sometimes called Lord Verulam, wrote in his essays that a people weighed down by heavy taxes cannot become brave or warlike. A nation burdened with poverty cannot act like a lion’s cub. Strength and courage require freedom and confidence.

Control Through Poverty

In this way, heavy taxation helped keep the population quiet. Poor and tired people are less likely to rise against authority. Even when they suffer injustice, they may endure it silently.

Thus, while corruption and high taxes may weaken an empire in the long run, they can also serve as tools of control. The rulers maintained order, but at the cost of fairness, prosperity, and the spirit of the people.

The Difficult Condition of Wallachia

The state and condition of the province of Wallachia has been no better, and in many ways worse, than that of Moldavia. Like Moldavia, Wallachia eventually came under the full control and possession of the Ottoman Empire. However, this did not happen all at once. At first, the country became tributary to the Turks while still being ruled by its own native princes.

Wallachia first agreed to pay tribute during the time of Sultan Bayezid. Although the country kept its own rulers, it recognized the authority of the Ottoman Sultan and paid regular taxes as a sign of submission Private Tours Balkan.

The Conquest Under Mehmed the Great

In the year 1462, Sultan Mehmed the Great attempted the complete conquest of Wallachia. At that time, the country was governed by its Voivode, Wladus (often identified with Vlad). During this period, internal division weakened the province. Wladus had a younger brother who, with the support of the Tatars and a political faction within Wallachia, claimed the principality for himself.

This younger brother was willing to accept the position of vassal to the Ottoman Empire. By accepting Ottoman authority, he secured his rule, but at the cost of the country’s independence. Such internal rivalries made it easier for the Ottomans to extend their influence.

War and Resistance in 1595

Later, in the year 1595, Michael the Voivode of Wallachia attempted to resist Ottoman control. He formed alliances with Sigismund of Transylvania and with the Voivode of Moldavia. Together, they fought a long and fierce war against the Ottoman Empire.

For a time, this alliance brought hope of freedom. However, the struggle was exhausting and filled with constant unrest. Political revolutions, internal disputes, and rival factions weakened the resistance. Instead of uniting strongly against a common enemy, divisions continued to damage their cause.

The Loss of Independence

As a result of these internal conflicts and long wars, Wallachia gradually lost its remaining independence. It became fully subject to the Ottoman Empire and was treated as an additional province under its power.

The Ottoman authorities placed a heavy yoke upon the land. Strict control, high tribute, and strong political supervision limited the freedom of the people. The author of the original text suggests that this misfortune was not only political but also a form of divine justice. According to this view, the suffering of these Christian provinces came partly from their own negligence, division, and lack of unity.

While they were divided by quarrels and internal disputes, their powerful enemy waited patiently for the right moment to act. When weakness appeared, the Ottoman Empire moved in and secured control. Thus, Wallachia’s condition became a warning of how internal conflict can open the door to foreign domination.

The Annual Tribute of Moldavia

The following account of Moldavia’s tribute was reported by a man who had worked for many years as an agent for the Voivode (Prince) of Moldavia and Wallachia under Ottoman authority. According to his information, the yearly tribute paid by Moldavia was as follows:

To the Grand Signior (Sultan): 120 purses of money. Each purse contained 500 dollars, making a total of 60,000 dollars per year.

10,000 okes of wax, each oke equal to about two and a half English pounds Private Tours Balkan.

10,000 okes of honey.

600 quintals of tallow for use in the Imperial Arsenal.

500 ox hides.

500 pieces of canvas, used for clothing, shirts for slaves, and other needs of the galleys.

1,330 okes of wax for the service of the Arsenal.

To the Chief Vizier: 10 purses (5,000 dollars) and a sable fur for a vest.

To the Vizier’s chief steward (Rabia): 1 purse (500 dollars).

To the Defterdar (Lord Treasurer): 1 purse (500 dollars).

This was the regular and official tribute that Moldavia paid each year to show its obedience to the Sultan.

Extra Demands and Hidden Costs

It would have been fortunate if this had been the full cost. However, there were many additional and unexpected expenses. Special missions were often invented simply to demand more money and gifts from the province. These extra payments sometimes equaled or even doubled the official yearly tribute.

In addition, the position of Prince of Moldavia was not permanent. It was usually granted for three years and was, in effect, sold to the highest bidder.

The Price of Becoming Prince

To receive the principality, the following payments were required:

To the Grand Signior: 150 purses (75,000 dollars).

To the Valide Sultan (Queen Mother): 50 purses (25,000 dollars).

To the Sultan’s favorite: 10 purses (5,000 dollars).

To the Chief Black Eunuch (Kızlar Ağa): 10 purses.

To the Prime Vizier and other officers: as much money as they could demand in negotiation.

This large sum was usually borrowed at very high interest, sometimes 40 or 50 percent, and in some cases the debt had to be doubled if not paid quickly.

The Burden on the People

Because many princes had no personal fortune, these debts were placed upon the country itself. The people were heavily taxed and oppressed to repay the borrowed money, the interest, and the annual tribute. The land was stripped of its wealth to satisfy both the Ottoman officials and the prince’s own needs.

The prince also needed to secure his future. After leaving office, he wanted enough wealth to live in comfort according to his former rank. This desire often led to greed and harsh taxation. Many of these princes came from humble backgrounds and, once in power, tried to collect as much money as possible.

In addition, they had to offer yearly gifts to powerful Ottoman ministers to ensure protection for themselves and their property. In this way, Moldavia suffered under heavy financial burdens, not only from official tribute but also from constant demands and corruption.

Plans to Change the Government

Several times, the Ottoman authorities considered changing the system of government in these three provinces. There were discussions about placing them directly under the control of Turkish Pashas, instead of allowing them to be ruled by local Christian princes. This change would have gone against the original agreements, or capitulations, made when these provinces first accepted Ottoman rule.

According to those early agreements, the provinces were allowed to keep a certain level of self-government under their own princes, as long as they paid tribute and remained loyal to the Sultan. However, over time, some Ottoman leaders thought it might be better to rule them more directly.

In the end, they decided not to make this change. The existing system was seen as more profitable and more useful for the interests of the empire Private Tours Balkan.

Christians Governing Christians

Under the current system, Christian princes ruled over Christian people, but these princes were appointed and controlled by the Ottoman Empire. This arrangement had certain advantages for the Turks. When oppression or heavy taxation took place, it was often carried out by a Christian ruler against his own people.

In this way, Christians became the instruments of suffering for their own brothers. Outrages, heavy taxes, and acts of injustice could be carried out more boldly. The Ottoman authorities could also send Turkish officers on profitable missions whenever they wished. These officials often found opportunities for personal gain.

Because the local prince had limited power and depended on the Sultan for his position, he was more likely to collect heavy taxes and demand payments in order to secure his own wealth and favor.

Why a Pasha Was Not Appointed

If a Turkish Pasha had been appointed as governor, the situation might have been different. A Pasha, as an official of the Ottoman state, would have considered it his duty and honor to protect the people under his rule. His reputation and authority would have been connected to their safety and order.

In that case, the provinces might have suffered less from extortion and violence. A Pasha might have acted as a true protector and patron. This could have reduced some of the misery and injustice.

However, from the Ottoman point of view, the present condition was more beneficial. As long as the provinces remained weak, divided, and dependent, they were easier to control. The people were allowed to imagine that direct Ottoman rule under a Pasha would be gentler and more just. But in reality, they were kept in a state of hardship, which better served the political and financial interests of the empire.

Thus, the system remained unchanged, not for the good of the people, but for the advantage of the state.

Lands of Constant War

These provinces have long been known as places of great struggle and suffering. In many wars between the Ottoman Empire and the Christian powers of Europe, these lands became battlefields. They were often described as the graves and cemeteries of many Turkish soldiers, because so many armies fought and died there.

In modern times, these regions became the stage for many tragic wars. The people defended themselves with courage and determination. They fought with as much bravery and skill as could be expected, especially when facing such an unequal enemy. On one side stood single, smaller provinces with limited resources. On the other side stood the vast and powerful Ottoman Empire, with its large armies and wealth.

Despite their courage, these provinces could not resist forever. After many years of war, loss, and destruction, they were finally forced to surrender Private Tours Balkan.

From Independent Princes to Ottoman Control

In the past, these lands had their own natural rulers. Their princes inherited their positions through lawful family lines. However, once the Ottoman Empire gained control, this system changed. The Sultan removed the true line of local princes and replaced them with new rulers of his own choosing.

These new princes were usually Christians of the Greek Orthodox Church. However, their religion was often the only qualification they had. The Ottoman authorities did not always consider their education, experience, wealth, or ability to govern. In many cases, the Sultan deliberately chose men of low background and little importance.

The official sign of the Sultan’s approval was the giving of the “Standard,” a banner that confirmed the new prince’s authority. Sometimes this symbol of power was given to men who had once been tavern keepers, fishmongers, or workers in other humble professions. By raising such men to high office, the Ottoman rulers weakened the respect that the people had for their governors.

Rule Through Humiliation and Weak Leadership

This policy may have been intentional. By appointing men of low status and little skill, the Ottoman Empire ensured that the provinces would remain weak and dependent. These governors often lacked the wisdom and ability needed for good leadership. As a result, corruption, injustice, and oppression became common.

The people of these lands suffered greatly. They were no longer simply tributaries paying taxes. They were treated as subjects and, in many ways, as servants of a foreign power. Their political freedom was lost, and their leaders often lacked both honor and competence.

In this way, provinces that had once been proud and brave became controlled territories under the strong hand of the Ottoman Empire.

Wealth and Change Among the Tatars

In earlier times, the Tatars were known for their simple and hard way of life. They lived in modest huts and wore plain woolen cloaks. However, after bringing great riches from their wars in Poland and earning large profits from the slave markets, some of them began to change their lifestyle.

With their new wealth, many Tatars gave up their simple clothing and began to wear expensive furs, such as sable. Others, who were more careful with their money, chose to build proper houses instead of living in poor huts. This showed that wealth was slowly changing their traditional way of life.

Yet not all used their riches wisely. Some became wasteful and careless. They spent their money on strong alcoholic drinks and on a popular drink called “Boza,” which was made from a type of grain. When drunk in large amounts, it could cause intoxication. This drink later became common among the Turks as well. Some Tatars gave themselves over to heavy eating and drinking. They lived in idleness, caring only for a full stomach and an easy life, without discipline or moderation Balkan Tours.

The End of the Tatar Discussion

This is enough to explain the relationship between the Tatars and the Ottoman government. Their political position, customs, and daily life have been described in greater detail in other books. What is clear is that they were both useful allies and dangerous neighbors, serving the Ottoman Empire in war while also living by raiding and trade.

The Tributary Princes of the Ottoman Empire

The strength of an empire is not measured only by the number of provinces it controls or the many governors and officials it appoints. It is also measured by the number of rulers who pay tribute to it. These tributary princes keep part of their lands and wealth, but they must give a large portion to a stronger power in order to avoid destruction.

Such was the case with the rulers of Moldavia, Wallachia, Transylvania, and Ragusa. These lands were caught between powerful neighbors: the Emperor of Germany, the King of Poland, and the Ottoman Sultan. For many years, they suffered from long wars and constant fighting. They were also weakened by internal conflicts and betrayal among their own leaders.

In the end, exhausted and divided, they surrendered themselves to the protection and control of the Ottoman Empire. Although they were not fully conquered provinces, they became tributary states. They had to pay heavy taxes and obey the Sultan’s demands. Their situation was often very difficult, and they were among the most oppressed of all the Sultan’s subjects.

Like Bees and Sheep

The condition of these provinces can be compared to bees and sheep. The Ottoman ruler allowed them to live and work, but mainly for his own benefit. Like bees that produce honey and sheep that give wool, these lands were valued for the wealth they produced. Their taxes and payments were carefully collected.

If their obedience was ever doubted, the Sultan could even allow Tatar raids into their lands. The Tatars would carry away goods and captives, and later sell some of these same people as slaves within the Ottoman territories. In this way, the suffering of these provinces could become even greater.

The Former Dacians

These three provinces were once part of ancient Dacia. In Roman times, the Dacians were known as brave and warlike people. Roman writers such as Virgil and Juvenal mentioned their strength and courage. They resisted Roman power for a long time before finally being defeated.

Over the centuries, however, their independence was lost. Surrounded by powerful empires and weakened by internal problems, they became tributaries of the Ottoman Sultan, paying for peace with their wealth and freedom.

Ancient Description of the Sarmatians

Ancient writers described the Sarmatians, who are often connected with the Tatars, as brave and powerful horsemen. A Latin historian explained that their courage seemed to exist mainly when they were fighting on horseback. In battle, when they arrived in groups of cavalry, almost no army could stand against them. However, when they were forced to fight on foot, they appeared weak and ineffective.

The writer also noted a strange contrast in their nature. The same men who seemed slow and lazy in quiet times became active and fierce in war. They disliked rest and peace, but they were full of energy in battle. Their strength was closely connected to their horses, and their way of life depended on speed, movement, and constant activity Balkan Tours.

Their Hard and Simple Way of Life

The Tatars lived a very hard life. Their food was simple and often rough. They especially ate horse meat. When a horse died during a march, they did not carefully check whether the animal had been sick, overheated, or exhausted. Instead, they quickly cut the meat and shared it among their companions.

One of their unusual cooking methods was to place the meat under their saddles while riding. During the long ride, the heat of the horse and the rider, along with the movement of the journey, softened and warmed the meat. By the evening, they believed it was ready to eat. What might seem strange to others was considered normal and even suitable for the table of their prince.

In addition to meat, they ate herbs, roots, and wild plants. Much of their food was eaten raw or only slightly prepared. They depended on what the earth naturally provided, without much use of fire or cooking.

Their Strong and Enduring Horses

Just as the men were used to hardship, their horses were also strong and patient animals. The horses could endure hunger, cold, and long journeys. During the severe winters of their homeland, when the ground was covered with deep snow, the horses survived by eating tree bark and any grass they could find under the snow.

These hardy animals were the key to Tatar power. Without their horses, they would not have been able to travel so quickly or fight so effectively.

Villages and Military Organization

The Tatars did not live in large cities. Their towns were more like villages made up of simple huts. These huts were built from sticks and covered with coarse cloth made from animal hair. They were light and easy to construct, fitting their mobile way of life.

It is said that there were as many as two hundred thousand such villages. When war was declared, their custom was to send one man from each village. In this way, they could quickly gather a very large army. Their simple living, strong horses, and organized system allowed them to form powerful forces in a short time.

The Capture of Thousands of Prisoners

In one single year, the Tatars were said to have captured one hundred and sixty thousand people. This number was reported by those who had seen official certificates given for each captive. For every person taken, a document was prepared and recorded. These certificates listed the name, country, and age of the captive.

The reason for this system was simple. The Tatar warrior was often a free-booter, meaning he lived by raiding and taking whatever he could. However, he was not allowed to capture and sell people who were already subjects of the Ottoman Empire. To prevent cheating, the Tatars had to prove that their captives were taken from enemy lands. Without these documents, they could not legally sell their prisoners to Ottoman buyers.

This careful record-keeping shows that even in violent times, there were rules between the Ottoman Empire and the Tatars. The Sultan wanted to make sure that his own people were not enslaved by mistake or by greed Balkan Tours.

The Tatars as Hunters of the Steppe

The Tatars were often compared to a jackal that hunts for a lion. In this image, the Ottoman Sultan was the lion, and the Tatars were the hunters who found and gathered the prey. They made fast and sudden attacks into neighboring lands.

Sometimes they traveled for ten or twelve days without causing any damage on their outward journey. However, when they turned back toward their own country, they attacked with great speed and violence. They robbed villages, burned towns, and captured men, women, and children of every age. Their return was like a flood that destroyed everything in its path.

Each Tatar warrior usually led three or four horses. These extra horses were used to carry captives and stolen goods. Because they changed horses often, they could travel very quickly, day and night, with only short rests. Their speed made it almost impossible for a regular army to catch them. An army that was organized could not move fast enough, and one that moved quickly was often too disordered to fight them properly.

The Fate of the Captives

The journey was cruel for the prisoners. Those who were wounded or too weak to continue were killed. Only the strong survived the long march back to Tatar lands. Once there, many were sold to Ottoman traders who came to buy slaves. The slave trade was one of the most profitable activities in Tatary.

Young boys and girls were sold for the highest prices. Beautiful girls were especially valued and treated like rare jewels. Sadly, many of them suffered abuse even before they were sold.

The Ancient Identity of the Tatars

In ancient times, these people were known as the Sarmatians. They were famous for their skill on horseback. They were powerful riders and brave fighters in open lands. However, they were not skilled in fighting on foot. The Roman historian Tacitus described them in this way, saying they were strong in cavalry but weak in infantry.

For many centuries, the Tatars remained known for their speed, horsemanship, and fierce raids across the plains.

The Relationship Between the Ottoman Empire and the Tatars

The people described in this text are the Tatars, who were considered close allies and almost like brothers to the Turks of the Ottoman Empire. According to an ancient agreement, if the Ottoman ruling family ever had no male heir, the Tatar ruler could claim the empire. Although this possibility was very distant and almost imaginary, it still had an important effect. It helped keep the Tatar ruler loyal and respectful toward the Ottoman Sultan.

This situation can be compared to a young man who hopes to inherit a large estate. Even if the inheritance is uncertain, the hope of gaining it makes him obedient and polite to the older man who may leave him his property. In the same way, the Tatar ruler remained loyal to the Ottoman Sultan because of the small but important possibility of future power.

Obedience and Communication

The Tatar ruler, known as the Khan, was obedient to the Ottoman Sultan just like other subjects of the empire. However, the Sultan did not rule the Tatars in the same direct way as he ruled other provinces. Instead of giving direct commands, he managed relations through official letters Balkan Tours.

These letters were very powerful. They carried the will and authority of the Grand Signior (another title for the Ottoman Sultan). Even though they were not always formal imperial decrees with official seals and signatures, they were treated as valid and binding orders. In this way, the Sultan maintained influence over the Tatar lands without constant direct control.

Military Obligations of the Tatars

There was also a clear military agreement between the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Tatary. According to this old agreement, whenever the Sultan personally led the army to war, the Tatar Khan was required to join him in person. He had to bring a large force of one hundred thousand soldiers.

If the Sultan did not go himself and instead sent the Grand Vizier or another general to lead the campaign, the Tatar Khan’s duty was lighter. In that case, he needed to send forty or fifty thousand soldiers. These troops were usually led by his son or by an important officer of his kingdom. The Tatar soldiers were not paid regular wages by the Ottoman treasury. Instead, they supported themselves through the booty and plunder they gained during war.

The Tatar Raids in 1669

In the year 1669, during the war between the Ottoman Empire and Hungary, the Tatars were called to support the Ottoman army. They carried out large and destructive raids into Hungary, as well as into Moravia and Silesia. They attacked many cities and towns, burning and looting as they advanced.

During these campaigns, the Tatars captured and carried away a great number of people as prisoners. These raids spread fear across the region and showed how powerful and mobile the Tatar cavalry could be. Their actions played an important role in supporting Ottoman military efforts, even though they often acted with great violence.

The relationship between the Ottoman Empire and the Tatars was based on ancient agreements, shared interests, and military cooperation. Although the Tatars had a certain level of independence, they remained loyal to the Sultan. Their hope of possible future inheritance and their duty to provide military support kept them closely tied to the Ottoman state. Through letters, agreements, and joint military campaigns, this alliance remained strong for many years.

The Tartar Peoples Under Ottoman Influence

The Vrecopentian Tartars live in Taurica Chersonesus, now known as Crimea. The main city there is Theodosia, today called Cafa. The Stagantian Tartars live by the Palus Meotis, between the Volga and Tanais rivers. These groups count as subjects—or at least close allies—of the Ottoman Empire.

Only the city of Cafa, out of all these lands, is directly under Turkish control and government. In my view, Cafa serves as a warning post and a guarantee of their loyalty. The Han, or prince, of this country is elected. But he must come from the true royal family line. The Grand Signior—the Ottoman Sultan—always confirms the choice. The Sultan also claims the power to remove a Han. He can replace a lazy father with his son or the next in line. This happens if the Han fails to send troops for war or shows any disrespect to the Ottoman court.

The Current Han and His Path to Power

The present Han, Mahomet Ghirei (the family surname), followed the custom of the eldest son. While his father lived, he stayed as a hostage in the Turkish town of Janboli. This place is in Thrace, four days’ journey from Adrianople. It sits on the Euxine, or Black Sea Balkan Tours.

Later, due to fears of him being too close to his homeland, they moved him to Rhodes. There, he lived a quiet, sad life until his father died. Then, he was called back to Constantinople. They girded him with a sword, and he swore loyalty to the Grand Signior. He went through all the usual ceremonies for a royal start.

Tensions and Refusal of Old Customs

Once settled in his kingdom, Mahomet Ghirei remembered his hard times on Rhodes. He resented the pride of the Ottoman Emperor. With advice from Poles and nearby Tartars, he saw it as shameful. Why should such an old and strong people send their heir as a hostage to neighbors?

So, this prince refused that part of submission. The Vizier Kupriuli complained about it many times. But with no way to fix it, he chose to ignore the issue for now.

Broader Context of Ottoman-Tartar Ties

This setup shows the clever politics of the Turks. They kept control without full conquest. Cafa acted like a key fortress, ensuring aid in wars. The Han’s election from one family kept things stable, but the Sultan’s approval meant real power stayed in Istanbul.

Mahomet Ghirei’s story highlights cracks in this system. Hostages built loyalty but bred resentment. By the 17th century, when this was written, Crimean Tartars were vital Ottoman allies against Russia and Poland. They raided for slaves and troops. Yet, leaders like Ghirei pushed for more independence.

Kupriuli, a powerful vizier under Sultan Mehmed IV, focused on reform. He tolerated the hostage refusal to avoid war. It was smart—picking battles wisely kept the alliance alive.

Today, we see echoes in modern Crimea. Once Tartar heartland, it’s now disputed between Ukraine and Russia. History reminds us how empires used pledges and customs to hold far lands.